By Ellen Meister
When I decided to resurrect America's most notorious yet beloved
wit as a character in a novel, I knew I'd inspire the wrath of some book reviewers. We are, after all, proprietary about our literary heroes. They
are our own special treasures, held close to our hearts and jealously guarded. So when a writer comes
along and mines that trove for material, there will be blood.
Still, FAREWELL, DOROTHY PARKER was published to some
outstanding trade reviews, garnering raves from Publishers Weekly, BookReporter, Library Journal and BookList. Even Kirkus Reviews put it at the top of the list for the week's best books.
So I was lulled into letting down my guard just when the assault finally
came from a couple of newspapers, and it felt like I was being sliced, diced,
eviscerated, burned, bitten and left to die. Next time, I'll remember to dress in
Kevlar.
In the meantime, it helps to know that I'm not alone--that even
the most revered literary works have had their share of detractors. So for all my
fellow authors who have felt the sting of bad reviews, I offer the following anti-venom: actual Amazon
one-star reviews of literary greats. See if you can guess which books they're about before
clicking on the reveal. *
EDITED TO ADD: Apparently this game is harder than I thought, so I'm supplying the list of titles to choose from:
PRIDE AND PREJUDICE • FAHRENHEIT 451 • GREAT GATSBY • THE SUN ALSO RISES • TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD • PORTNOY'S COMPLAINT • EMPIRE FALLS • CATCHER IN THE RYE • OLIVE KITTERIDGE • REVOLUTIONARY
ROAD
*For the sake of this game, names and titles have been redacted. Spelling and grammatical errors have been left as is.
Great American Novel - You Are Not!
How this is an American classic, I will never know. The book is
short and barely has any character development. You don't route for anyone nor
really care about finding about anybody's back story - including [redacted]
himself. The book does do an ok job of portraying that "rich, post-World
War I, 1920s era apathy generation" but the problem with portraying apathy
is that your readers are going to be apathetic. There is one part of the book
that has some "action" in it but it's so shoe horned in for the sole
purpose of rapping up the story that it's almost unbelievable. For those that
poo-poo Twilight for "stalker" type mentality of Edward, you have the
same behavior in [redacted] as well. I
was very underwhelmed and feel sorry for the countless public school students
who had to suffer through this book. The one positive thing I can say is that
it wasn't as boring as "Wuthering Heights". Final Grade - F
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
Keeping up with the ...
I hated this book! It is like a Victorian Keeping up the
Kardashians. How superficial can you get? I realize that in that era the only
hope for a woman was to marry well. Why promote that idea as a romantic one in
our present day lives is just stupid. I see nothing romantic in the book
whatsoever. The snobbery is almost unbearable. This is one of those situations
where you read hoping it will get better, it never did. What a waste of my
time.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
What?
Umm...you must be kidding. Mindless nonsense. This is the story
of several, self absorbed drukards stumbling their way through a short season
of life together; they are self indulged, lazy and broke. The book finally
comes to a ridiculously predictable ending. Yes, of course there is symbolism
throughout, but do not waste your time.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
Ouch
This book is a classic judging by the reviews. I had never heard
of it and was probably better off. [Redacted]
is a horrible character, obsessed by his penis. I have never found
toilet humour particularly funny and so you must judge my opinion in that
light. if you have heard of Ross O'Kelly Carroll then this is the jewish
equivalent. Ross is the cliche Dublin 4, Alex the New Jersey jew. Sitting on
his physchiatrist couch bemoaning his parents. His mother threatened him with
the knife if he won't eat. He spends his teen and adult years either
masturbating anywhere and anytime or with the fair Protestant college girls or
his dumb but sexually insatiable model. [Redacted] is condesending and obsessed, unlikeable in a
Woody Allen style obsession with self and sex. The novel is dated as no doubt
it was titillatingly scandalous of its time but frankly it is boring. The long
rambling rant eventually grates. This book would be better as a novella, the
theme and characters are interesting to start with but the problem is that it
becomes repetitious and boring. It wanders back and forward from childhood to
love affair, from Monkey the model to Pumpkin or Pilgrim the debutantes.
[Redacted] repeats himself and becomes
gratingly tedious. I suffered to the end, only so I could justify my rant, and
gained nothing from it. Judging by the number of positive reviews here I am
perhaps missing the point. For me who also hates Woody Allen films this is
toilet humour at its worst. If you like the images of a teenage boy humping raw
liver, his sisters used underwear and just about anything else while his mother
hammers on the bathroom door demanding to see his stool then read on.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
How On Earth Did This Book Win The Pulitzer?
I just finished reading this novel and I am mystified by all of
the acclaim it has received. Far from being an accurate depiction of small-town
life, it is a dull, mind-numbing work populated by repulsive characters who
resemble redneck cartoons more than flesh and blood human beings. Many times I
wanted to fling the book across the room out of frustration with its snail-like
pacing and terminally unhappy characters.
If you're looking for a realistic portrait of life in rural
Maine, try anything by Cathie Pelletier - particularly her Mattagash trilogy.
These books offer everything - humor, heart, emotion - that [redacted] fails to
deliver.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
This book is filled with evocative prose that evokes tedious,
boring, mundane, desperately unfulfilled life in 50's suburbia. I cannot
imagine why anyone would want to read it.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
An American classic????
I waited 52 years to read this book. I should have waited 52
more. A real snoozefest. I don't see what all the fuss is about.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
Babble of an Idiot
I made a bona fide attempt to read this book. After the first
few pages, it became apparent to me that the novel was not a piece of
literature but rather babble of a mentally retarded person. In the style of the
book, I could describe it as "some goddamn crap about some guy or
something." One beneficial consequence of reading a few pages of this
"work" is that, after that, nearly any book would seem like a
masterpiece of literature.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
Target Practice
Heyyyy I had to read this book for school and it was the worst
thing I ever read. A worthless good for nothing piece of junk! Actually it is
good for something. I took this book with me to rifle practice and i shot at
this instead of the target. I got busted but hey it was worth it. Mail me if
you want a picture of my shooting.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
Boring story, miserable characters
I don't know why all the great reviews. I found the story dull,
about miserable characters I cared nothing about, in a depressing setting.
The writing was too heavy on uninteresting detail and I could
not even get halfway through the book.
Each chapter begins with a new character introduction, which for
me is frustrating - just when you get to know one character, you are
jumped to a new one with little or no tie in to the previous
introductions. I'm sure eventually they tie together, but I was halfway
through and saw no reason to go on.
Not my type of story, I guess. If you like a story about
depressed (and depressing) people living in a small town in Maine, this one is
for you.
Can you guess which book this reviewer hates? Click here for answer.
How many did you get right? For a chance to win an autographed copy of FAREWELL, DOROTHY PARKER, post your score below. I promise not to judge you.
______________________________________________________________________
Ellen Meister lives on Long Island and is the author of four novels, including FAREWELL, DOROTHY PARKER (Putnam 2013) and THE OTHER LIFE (Putnam 2011). She is an editor and writing coach, and teaches creative writing at Hofstra University Continuing Education. For more information visit ellenmeister.com.
I didn't get any titles right, but I loved every review. In a good way. If only artists (including writers) had thicker skin. But then we wouldn't be artists, then would we!
ReplyDeleteGreat blog!
I'm sure my Fb and twitter friends will agree! Can;t wait to see if anyone guesses them all..
Thanks for playing, Leslie ... and for admitting you didn't get any right!
DeleteAnd yes, writers should have thicker skins. People always tell me I need to get one, but they don't me where they are. They don't sell them at Target, alas.
Gearing up to go hide, Ellen, because my skin has always been tender!
ReplyDeleteI'm going to come back to these as a reminder as I duck under one of my hats and don the big sunglasses.
Greetings to a fellow thin-skinned writer! I hope this exercise helps you come out of hiding.
DeleteEllen, that was so much fun! I didn't get ANY of those right!!
ReplyDeleteI think it's a sign that the acid-tongued reviewers didn't "get" the books!
DeleteWhat a fabulous, fun post, Ellen!! I didn't get any of these right, either. But here is what I know I'm right about. Those who can write, write. And those who can't write, write reviews. Or teach gym.
ReplyDeleteIt also reminds us that bad reviews can't kill great books.
Can't wait to share this with my FB friends.
*And those who can't write, write reviews."
DeleteLove it! I'm going to remember that!!
What a terrific turn-the-tables post, Ellen! As always, your clever writing, moxie and sense of humor shines through!
ReplyDeleteYour comment is my favorite review of the day! Thank you, Laura!!
DeleteI only guessed the first two. That was fun! And made a good point.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much, Karin!
DeleteI got four right. That was really fun. And reminds us all not to take those stinging reviews too seriously. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteGlad you liked it, Ericka! Thanks for playing.
DeleteI enjoyed _Farewell, Dorothy Parker_ and hadn't thought about the courage required to deal with those who are "proprietary about our literary heroes."
ReplyDeleteNow that I'm thinking of it, I'm reminded of a poetry class at UMSL, and the young African-American students' angry response to my signing up to do my oral report on Langston Hughes, including the logical to their young selves argument that he wasn't contemporary. My compromise was to make my written report on Hughes and choose John Berryman for the oral report, forcing myself to face the personal demon of Berryman's suicidal leap from the Washington Ave bridge while I was a student at U of MN.
Hi, Mary. Thanks for checking in and for sharing your story ... I suppose the silver lining is that you got to explore two different poets. Thanks again for your kind words and support for FDP!
DeleteI decided to put my poem on Berryman on my FB note page
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/notes/mary-garrett/crossing-the-washington-avenue-bridge/10151634989634179
Guessed right on about half of these. And you're so spot on about reviews and reviewers. One reviewer of my debut novel said his/her money would have been better spent on an automatic potato peeler. I wanted to send one to the reviewer.
ReplyDeleteThis was a great post, and it reminded me of something I'd caution my students about...that just because s/he didn't like a book/short story, whatever, didn't mean it wasn't good. if we applied that to food, liver would disappear as a meal choice!
Thanks for this!
A potato peeler! Oh, no!! Someone recently posted a review of one of my older books saying they hated it so much they wished they could get it off their Kindle. That's a lot of hate!
DeleteAnd yes, it's all so subjective. Thanks for stopping in, Christa!
OMG Christa. Points for creativity... I guess?
DeleteFun post. So true--how our taste in books is so unique and individual. A bad review can sting--especially when the review isn't about the craft in the writing of the book but more in whether that person -- through their own personal prism -- liked the book.
ReplyDeleteThanks for all the reviews to read!
xoMaggie
Thanks, Maggie! xo
DeleteI'm still gasping! Seriously! Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and some people are paid to share theirs, but when one not only endeavors, but succeeds in writing and revising and publishing a novel, it is the life force, the soul, the innermost imaginings on the page. Handle with Care.
ReplyDeleteThe life force--yes! That's why the attacks always feel so personal. Thanks Michele.
DeleteNot everyone will like every book, but there are books out there for all tastes.
ReplyDeleteI'm kind of thinking that the reviews might be more entertaining then some of the books.
I did not get a single one right, but that's okay.
Hi, Mary. I have indeed read some hilarious Amazon reviews! But yes, it's all a matter of taste. :)
DeleteThis is a great post... and a great reminder.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Bethany!! And guess what? You're the winner of a signed copy of Farewell, Dorothy Parker! Email me your address and I'll send it right out to you.
Deleteellen (at) ellenmeister (dot) com