By Laura Spinella
Since I am currently bleeding revision, it seems like an appropriate
topic for my GBC post. So hang on a sec while I clamp off an artery, pump in
some plasma, and we’ll write a blog. I’m at the halfway point on a lengthy,
cumbersome revision to book three—but whose revision isn’t lengthy and
cumbersome? Part of my plight is that I’m a miserable multitasker. Revision, in
particular, leaves me so knotted and burrowed that brushing my teeth seems like
one challenge too many. Point of fact, I’ve barely had time for friends and
family, while PERFECT TIMING promotion has gone the way of shoulda, coulda,
woulda. And damn, I’ve hardly had a chance to marvel over my Facebook scrapbook,
compliments of Mr. Zuckerberg.
When I turned in this
manuscript, it was met with singular enthusiasm. From there, briefly, I had
this obtuse and vain notion that my book was ready to fly—following a civil and
forthcoming edit, naturally. Ha! Yeah,
the bruises are still healing from that fall off the turnip truck.
Realistically, I knew better. Enthusiasm also came with a three-page footnote,
suggestions for my “wonderful and promising” novel. Say what? But that’s the way
it goes, right? And if you’re fortunate to play a part in traditional book publishing,
it’s wise to view that glass as half full. I believe the opposite reaction
would have resulted in a blog about the short-lived life of book three. (Well, book seven if you light up my flashdrives, but who's counting) This
brings me to what I might contribute here, in the midst of my all-consuming, often
maddening revision. It’s a universal experience that leaves writers’ wishing they
wrote pop-up books or, better still, obscure pamphlets on improving dry soil
regions.
Here is what I have learned.
Come Prepared:
Before I began, I stepped away. I spent a couple weeks not looking at any
of it, then a few more weeks studying the suggested revisions. I argued some in
my head and saw the “how dumb am I…?" sense
in others. I considered what existed versus what could be. When I was finally
ready to sit, I cleaned up my office space and even Windexed my computer
screen. I figured I was in for the long haul.
Pace Yourself:
The amount of time it takes my washing machine to cycle through a large
load setting. That was my dream schedule. Realistically, by the time I finish
this rewrite washing machines may be obsolete, replaced by Rosie the Robot. In
truth, no good writing comes out of rushing. I can’t speak for anyone else’s
process, but I’m a do-it-in-sections kind of girl. I won’t move forward until it
feels right. If that means revising
Chapter Twelve until the significant difference between using “She” versus “Aubrey”
to begin paragraph four is something more than atom splitting, so be it.
Speaking of feeling:
Go with your gut. I’ve embraced the bulk of my proposed revisions. Why
not? Someone more successful than me put them on paper. It did take downtime to digest the scope of the undertaking, but I get it. I really do. However,
there was one POV note that had me banging my head and wringing my hands. I
wrote and rewrote to the suggested tune, but things only got worse. The story
was bad, the rhythm was off. Try as I
might, I could not see a certain portion of this novel from a certain character’s
POV. When I decided to go with my gut, I had no regret about passing on this
particular revision. End of story.
Ignore your audience:
While we all seek an audience for our work, this is a long rehearsal. It’s not show time. Conversely, this work in
progress is not a draft, the kind of writing that would otherwise benefit from
a roundtable discussion. Said editor or
agent has presented a specific vision for the finished product. If someone
offers input, make sure that person can view the work from that same ten-thousand
foot view. It’s too easy to be steered off course by the well-meaning. On the
other hand, if you’re lucky enough to have somebody who knows you, your book,
and your revisions… Well, thoughts of holding that person hostage in a linen
closet (just until it’s over) have crossed my mind.
Ignore other writers:
Ah, this one’s hard to maintain, kind of like healthy eating or a single glass of wine. In the regular realm of writing there’s always someone
who’s got it better. They’re selling more books, drowning in terrific reviews,
and flabbergasted into sharing humble Facebook posts about their unexpected
success. Yeah, well, we all did something great at least once, whether it’s in
our mother’s eyes or our publisher. If you’re spending time monitoring the
competition you may lack the energy, and often manufactured eagerness,
required to tackle 410 pages of your own brilliant mess.
And the best revision advice:
That doesn’t come from me. It comes from the one and only Elmore Leonard,
who offered enough writing pearls of wisdom to strand a double set. While all are to be heeded, there are two
snippets I keep at the forefront of this revision: Try to leave out the part that readers tend to
skip. Blunt works for
me and this is a gem that resonates. Am
I bored? Are the characters bored? Will
the reader be bored? Will anyone really
give a flying fig about the poetic prose used to describe the color of the sky?
If the answer is yes… or no, then out it goes. This leaves my other cherished Elmore
idiom: rewrite the parts that sound like
writing… Equally clear and vague, I think you really have to know your own
story to answer that one. I also see it as the map for the vicious circle that
is revision, because once you can recognize the parts that sounds like writing, you’re more than halfway home.
Laura Spinella is the award winning author of BEAUTIFUL DISASTER, a RITA finalist, and the newly released PERFECT TIMING. Visit her at lauraspinella.net.