Sunday, October 6, 2013

Critique Groups: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times by Wendy Nelson Tokunaga


I’m certain that virtually every published novelist has benefited from getting feedback from a critique group. And I’m sure every published novelist has had the experience of pulling out her hair and running down the street screaming after at least one critique group meeting. That’s the nature of the beast when it comes to critique groups: you probably can’t live with them, but you also can’t live without them.

No matter how experienced of a writer you are, it’s rough to hear what’s wrong with your novel, no matter how constructive the feedback. But the best way I’ve found to take constructive criticism is to think of it as a gift, something that will help me look at the big picture of my novel and will inspire me. The ideal is when this results in an epiphany of how to fix things so that the novel will be the best it can be. And a good critique group can help you accomplish this.

However, finding a good critique group can be tricky. Every writer probably has her wish list for a dream critique group. Here’s mine:

~ An in-person group that meets at a time and place convenient for all members.

~ Members who are equal to me in writing skill or even better so I can learn from them.

~ All members working on novels (though memoirs can work too).

~ Every member willing to read 20-25 pages at a time (and even more in some cases).

~ Verbal feedback given during the meeting, and also written feedback to take home.

~ Emphasis on the “big picture” as opposed to line editing.

~ The bulk of the meeting spent on critiquing as opposed to socializing or group therapy.

~ Members who are committed to the group and also willing to discuss general writing and craft issues.

How do you find a critique group? That can be tricky too. Many people find groups through the local chapters of writing organizations such as Mystery Writers of America, Romance Writers of America, Sisters in Crime, etc. You can also find people through writers conferences, colleges where creative writing is taught and through MeetUps.

Online critique groups are great for those in more challenging geographic areas, though one of the benefits of face-to-face groups is the ability to break away from the isolation that plagues many writers. But there are some who feel that it’s a bit easier to take criticism via the online world instead of in-person. What wouldn’t be appropriate in a face-to-face group (e.g., yelling Shut up, shut up, shut upyou don’t know what the hell you’re talking about) is quite acceptable when sitting in front of the computer in the privacy of your own home. She Writes and Ladies Who Critique are just a couple of groups that provide services to match critique partners online.

Girlfriends, what is your wish list for your dream critique group?

Wendy Nelson Tokunaga is the author of the novels, "Midori by Moonlight" and "Love in Translation" (both published by St. Martin's Press), and the e-book novels, "Falling Uphill" and "His Wife and Daughters," and e-book short story, “The Girl in the Tapestry.” She's also the author of the nonfiction e-book, "Marriage in Translation: Foreign Wife, Japanese Husband."  Wendy holds an MFA in Creative Writing from University of San Francisco and teaches for Stanford University's Online Writer's Studio Novel Certificate Program. She also does private manuscript consulting for novels and memoirs. Follow her on Twitter at @Wendy_Tokunaga, friend her on Facebook and visit her website at: www.WendyTokunaga.com

15 comments:

  1. Amen, sister... regarding your dream team critique group! And great advice/links to pass along, Wendy!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, Laura! Would be great to have a dream team critique group. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wendy, love this! I want to join this dream critique group!! I have definitely had the situation where I ran out of a group running and screaming....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post, Wendy! The only thing I differ on is the level of others' talent. I find I learn as much about writing from critiquing other people's work as having them critique my own and sometimes I actually learn more from critiquing those who are more inexperienced. By identifying what isn't working in someone else's writing, I become more sensitive to those weaknesses in my own writing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you, Lauren. And I always tell my students that you often learn more from critiquing others than getting critiqued yourself. But in a group for me personally I want at least a certain level playing field of all members. :-)

      Delete
  5. This is really sound advice. I feel like you are describing a dream man. I never knew critique groups like this could exist. Thanks for the resources and the wish list.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment, Ariella. And maybe you'd find your dream man in your dream critique group -- LOL!

      Delete
  6. You were probably the first person to critique my writing and I never forgot it - very constructive. I've been a part of some good, some not so good online critique groups but I think I really need an in-person group. Great advice. Writing is so lonely. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Kathy! Yes, I agree that an in-person group is optimal. Good luck in finding one!

      Delete
  7. I love this list. I've never been in an in person critique group (besides my local editor so that's one-sided!) I think if the group wants to socialize they could come early or stay later.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How interesting, Malena, that you have never been in an in-person critique group. It's certainly a different dynamic.

      Delete
  8. As a reviewer I do my best to deliver honest opinions in a heartfelt, respectful and hopefully constructive way. I can imagine how difficult it is for an author to read criticisms about her work.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Amazing list! That's my dream group.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks for your comment, Mina. I think all of writers are grateful for reviewers who are respectful with their criticism. :-)

    ReplyDelete